Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Grenada
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Grenada

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Poor
Fair
1,656
SOCIAL INDEX
14.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
293rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Immigrants from Grenada Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,164,820 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.073. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to an increase of 18.3 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.
Immigrants from Grenada Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 41.3%), householder income over 65 years ($50,747 compared to $57,114, a difference of 12.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $48,749, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,279 compared to $50,298, a difference of 0.040%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,311 compared to $86,736, a difference of 1.8%), and median household income ($76,517 compared to $78,682, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income
Income MetricImmigrants from GrenadaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,123
Tragic
$39,827
Median Family Income
Tragic
$89,249
Tragic
$94,472
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,517
Tragic
$78,682
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,596
Tragic
$43,998
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,279
Tragic
$50,298
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,932
Tragic
$38,028
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,538
Tragic
$48,749
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,311
Tragic
$86,736
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$85,552
Tragic
$91,385
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,747
Tragic
$57,114
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
16.2%
Exceptional
22.8%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 47.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 40.5%), and receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 0.79%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.95%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (20.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from GrenadaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Poverty
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
14.2%
Families
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
10.5%
Males
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
15.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
20.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Tragic
19.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
19.7%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.9%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
15.8%
Fair
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
17.8%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
12.9%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 65.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 52.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.8%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from GrenadaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Unemployment
Tragic
6.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
7.6%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
15.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.6%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 53.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 13.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.77%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from GrenadaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.6%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.7%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
39.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
67.2%
Exceptional
76.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.8%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.5%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.3%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.0%
Tragic
82.0%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.9%), married-couple households (37.5% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and single mother households (8.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 0.10%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.9%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from GrenadaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Family Households
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
62.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.2%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.5%
Tragic
43.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.34
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.2%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.1%
Tragic
44.3%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Poor
32.9%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 259.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 128.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 107.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 43.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 88.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 107.1%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from GrenadaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
37.5%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
62.7%
Average
89.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
28.7%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
9.1%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
2.7%
Fair
6.2%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 25.0%), no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 14.1%), and college, under 1 year (59.1% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.0% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.12%), 10th grade (91.6% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and 8th grade (94.3% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.22%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from GrenadaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
96.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Tragic
96.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.0%
Tragic
93.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.6%
Tragic
91.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Tragic
90.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.4%
Tragic
88.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.6%
Tragic
86.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.3%
Tragic
83.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.1%
Tragic
62.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.4%
Tragic
56.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.6%
Tragic
43.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.0%
Tragic
35.5%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Tragic
13.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Poor
1.7%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 34.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 28.1%), and disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.14%), female disability (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.8% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from GrenadaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Average
11.2%
Females
Fair
12.4%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.94%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.1%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.8%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
47.9%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.2%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Average
2.5%