Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Nepal Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,947,251 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.291. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.049% in Immigrants from Nepal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to a decrease of 48.6 Immigrants from Nepal.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 53.8%), householder income over 65 years ($50,747 compared to $61,843, a difference of 21.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $102,190, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $40,704, a difference of 3.0%), householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $52,611, a difference of 3.7%), and median earnings ($45,596 compared to $47,925, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 68.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 57.0%), and married-couple family poverty (7.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 53.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 2.6%), single female poverty (21.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 57.8%), male unemployment (7.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 56.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 50.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 27.2%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 22.8%), and married-couple households (37.5% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 0.080%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.21, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 256.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 103.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 94.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 42.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 86.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 94.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 58.9%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 27.9%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.50%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 30.0%), ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.5%), and hearing disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.81%), male disability (10.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.9%).