Immigrants from Grenada vs Apache Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,987,757 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Apache within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.117. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Apache. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to an increase of 18.6 Apache.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Apache communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 51.8%), median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $34,895, a difference of 20.2%), and per capita income ($41,123 compared to $34,886, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $82,184, a difference of 4.1%), median family income ($89,249 compared to $84,451, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,747 compared to $54,668, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Apache communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 65.9%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 43.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 13.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Apache communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 62.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 36.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.78%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Apache communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 40.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 60.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Apache communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 41.4%), married-couple households (37.5% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 17.1%), and family households with children (25.2% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.4%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.46, a difference of 3.7%), and family households (62.6% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Apache communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 240.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 169.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 132.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 42.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 92.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 132.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Apache communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 33.0%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 27.3%), and bachelor's degree (35.0% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (90.1% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.25%), high school diploma (85.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and ged/equivalency (81.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Apache communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 115.3%), hearing disability (2.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 86.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 58.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 4.1%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.4%).