Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Pakistan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,940,334 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Pakistan within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.262. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.076% in Immigrants from Pakistan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to a decrease of 76.4 Immigrants from Pakistan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 67.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $114,434, a difference of 33.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,747 compared to $66,617, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $43,052, a difference of 2.7%), householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $56,789, a difference of 4.1%), and median earnings ($45,596 compared to $51,693, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 70.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 55.3%), and family poverty (12.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 54.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 12.8%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 15.9%), and single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 51.6%), male unemployment (7.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 47.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 37.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 9.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 36.8%), married-couple households (37.5% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 33.7%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.30, a difference of 1.3%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and family households (62.6% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 228.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 134.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 117.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 41.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 95.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 117.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 51.5%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 33.0%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.47%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 27.0%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.3%), and disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and male disability (10.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 6.2%).