Immigrants from Grenada vs Pennsylvania German Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,463,338 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.630. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.524% in Pennsylvania Germans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to an increase of 523.8 Pennsylvania Germans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 89.8%), median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $34,802, a difference of 20.5%), and per capita income ($41,123 compared to $37,842, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($76,517 compared to $75,814, a difference of 0.93%), median male earnings ($50,279 compared to $50,878, a difference of 1.2%), and median family income ($89,249 compared to $91,763, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 59.9%), receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 55.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 51.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (20.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 4.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 58.7%), male unemployment (7.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 58.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 82.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 16.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 40.3%), married-couple households (37.5% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 34.3%), and currently married (39.1% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.19, a difference of 4.6%), and family households (62.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 240.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 178.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 145.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 42.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 104.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 145.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 85.8%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 30.0%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (90.1% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.23%), 9th grade (93.0% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and 10th grade (91.6% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 106.5%), hearing disability (2.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 70.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.8% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 0.88%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.88%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.7%).