Immigrants from Grenada vs South American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,447,976 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.118. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to a decrease of 10.2 South American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 53.0%), householder income over 65 years ($50,747 compared to $62,215, a difference of 22.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $101,171, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $52,979, a difference of 2.9%), median earnings ($45,596 compared to $46,952, a difference of 3.0%), and median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $40,019, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 49.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 38.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 3.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and single female poverty (21.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 43.2%), male unemployment (7.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 37.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 40.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 12.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 26.8%), married-couple households (37.5% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 22.8%), and currently married (39.1% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (62.6% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 210.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 129.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 110.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 40.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 88.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 110.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 44.1%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 27.1%), and no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.55%), nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.56%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 41.3%), hearing disability (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 30.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.73%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.8%).