Immigrants from Grenada vs Nepalese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 7,818,017 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Nepalese within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.480% in Nepalese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to a decrease of 480.0 Nepalese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 37.4%), householder income over 65 years ($50,747 compared to $58,761, a difference of 15.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $93,355, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $54,472, a difference of 0.12%), median male earnings ($50,279 compared to $49,458, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,311 compared to $91,498, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 41.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 37.5%), and receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.31%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 51.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 41.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 32.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 10.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 55.6%), married-couple households (37.5% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 21.5%), and family households with children (25.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.42, a difference of 2.4%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and family households (62.6% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 406.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 219.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 174.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 47.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 114.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 174.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 38.2%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 33.3%), and bachelor's degree (35.0% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (85.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.31%), 12th grade, no diploma (88.4% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.32%), and 11th grade (90.1% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 50.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 33.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.44%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.46%), and disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 3.0%).