Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Germany Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,079,523 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Germany within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.182. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.033% in Immigrants from Germany. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to a decrease of 33.5 Immigrants from Germany.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 70.3%), householder income over 65 years ($50,747 compared to $62,544, a difference of 23.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $103,282, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,596 compared to $47,566, a difference of 4.3%), median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $39,603, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $51,190, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 65.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 56.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.27%), single female poverty (21.8% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 49.9%), male unemployment (7.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 46.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 54.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 13.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 32.7%), married-couple households (37.5% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 26.8%), and currently married (39.1% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.6%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.15, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 329.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 148.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 129.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 45.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 102.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 129.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 55.5%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 51.7%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 58.5%), disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 50.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.8% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.8%).