Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Barbados Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,146,547 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Barbados within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.882. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.654% in Immigrants from Barbados. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to an increase of 653.5 Immigrants from Barbados.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 10.3%), householder income over 65 years ($50,747 compared to $53,766, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $89,394, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,311 compared to $88,687, a difference of 0.43%), median earnings ($45,596 compared to $45,816, a difference of 0.48%), and median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $41,685, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 8.0%), and family poverty (12.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.47%), single female poverty (21.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.70%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 13.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 69.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.2%), married-couple households (37.5% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and family households with children (25.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.54%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.58%), and family households (62.6% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 31.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 29.0%), and no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 12.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 24.8%), and no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 27.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 7.6%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.10%), 4th grade (96.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.10%), and 5th grade (96.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.3%), hearing disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.040%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.080%).