Immigrants from Grenada vs Puget Sound Salish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 18,592,268 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.445. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.444% in Puget Sound Salish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to a decrease of 444.4 Puget Sound Salish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 56.8%), householder income over 65 years ($50,747 compared to $59,934, a difference of 18.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $98,340, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($41,123 compared to $41,495, a difference of 0.90%), median earnings ($45,596 compared to $46,333, a difference of 1.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $55,543, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 66.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 56.6%), and married-couple family poverty (7.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 49.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 37.7%), and male unemployment (7.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 53.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 16.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 34.1%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.3%), and married-couple households (37.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 4.7%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.17, a difference of 5.4%), and family households with children (25.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 293.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 243.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 190.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 44.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 116.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 190.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 53.4%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 25.4%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 80.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 56.3%), and male disability (10.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.13%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.1%).