Immigrants from Grenada vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 10,952,312 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.915. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.145% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to an increase of 144.8 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 45.1%), median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $31,489, a difference of 33.2%), and per capita income ($41,123 compared to $32,345, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($89,249 compared to $82,064, a difference of 8.8%), median household income ($76,517 compared to $67,965, a difference of 12.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $75,945, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 68.7%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 42.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.84%), family poverty (12.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and male poverty (14.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 150.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 94.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 84.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 46.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 44.8%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 29.8%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (25.2% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 1.6%), currently married (39.1% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households (62.6% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 409.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 241.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 191.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 47.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 110.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 191.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 39.7%), bachelor's degree (35.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 31.4%), and no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.4% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 0.53%), nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 89.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 35.7%), and disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.4%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 5.6%).