Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Serbia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,401,082 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.717. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.211% in Immigrants from Serbia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to an increase of 211.2 Immigrants from Serbia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 60.9%), median family income ($89,249 compared to $113,463, a difference of 27.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $107,569, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $53,321, a difference of 2.3%), median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $43,385, a difference of 3.5%), and median earnings ($45,596 compared to $51,557, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 80.3%), married-couple family poverty (7.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 64.0%), and family poverty (12.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 8.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (7.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 48.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 42.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 41.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 12.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 52.3%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 28.4%), and married-couple households (37.5% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.60%), family households with children (25.2% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (62.6% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 215.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 83.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 80.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 40.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 79.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 80.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 70.7%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 55.4%), and no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.94%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.95%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 36.5%), disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 25.5%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.45%), disability (11.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 5.9%).