Asian vs Swiss Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,866,315 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.614. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 2.8 Swiss.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($101,681 compared to $85,681, a difference of 18.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $95,511, a difference of 18.0%), and median female earnings ($44,586 compared to $37,904, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $51,493, a difference of 10.7%), wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,822 compared to $61,621, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 23.0%), single father poverty (14.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 18.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.15%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and male poverty (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 27.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.62%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 13.8%), divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 12.8%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.67%), married-couple households (49.5% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 0.97%), and family households (66.5% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 10.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 57.0%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 25.1%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.7% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 0.32%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.93%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 50.4%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 29.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.8%).