Asian vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,698,812 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.246. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 1.2 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $71,697, a difference of 57.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $75,945, a difference of 55.9%), and per capita income ($50,057 compared to $32,345, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 14.8%), householder income over 65 years ($68,822 compared to $59,383, a difference of 15.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $44,003, a difference of 29.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 95.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.0% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 65.6%), and single father poverty (14.6% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 64.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 5.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.9%), and single mother poverty (26.0% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 28.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 185.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 150.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 143.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 75.9%), divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 39.3%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 0.050%), average family size (3.28 compared to 3.64, a difference of 10.9%), and family households with children (29.1% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 33.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 27.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 108.2%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 91.6%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 84.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.5% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.15%), 10th grade (93.5% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.78%), and high school diploma (89.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 60.5%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 51.6%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.53%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 6.1%).