Asian vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 324,857,016 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.324. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to an increase of 17.3 Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,057 compared to $39,403, a difference of 27.0%), median male earnings ($63,827 compared to $50,488, a difference of 26.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $90,722, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($68,822 compared to $64,920, a difference of 6.0%), householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $53,078, a difference of 7.4%), and wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 33.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 24.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and single father poverty (14.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 22.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 26.7%), births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 24.0%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (66.5% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple households (49.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 27.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 16.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 66.1%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 60.0%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 59.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.020%), 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and 11th grade (92.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 31.4%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 26.4%), and male disability (10.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 4.8%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.1%).