Asian vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,536,870 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.302. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 66.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $85,552, a difference of 38.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,822 compared to $50,747, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $54,538, a difference of 4.5%), median female earnings ($44,586 compared to $41,932, a difference of 6.3%), and median earnings ($53,690 compared to $45,596, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 83.6%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 60.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.5% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 57.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 16.0%), single male poverty (11.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 16.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 52.5%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 48.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 34.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 45.8%), births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 35.5%), and married-couple households (49.5% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.28 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.9%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and family households (66.5% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 317.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 156.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 128.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 45.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 98.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 128.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 77.3%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 47.2%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.40%), 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and 3rd grade (97.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 28.3%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.1%), male disability (10.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 6.9%).