Asian vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 188,171,418 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.264. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 1.0 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,057 compared to $29,031, a difference of 72.4%), median household income ($101,681 compared to $59,159, a difference of 71.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $69,759, a difference of 69.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 20.4%), householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $42,380, a difference of 34.5%), and median female earnings ($44,586 compared to $33,046, a difference of 34.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 154.4%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 143.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.0% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 126.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.0% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 54.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 61.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 66.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 112.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 105.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 102.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 9.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 31.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 15.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 13.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 92.3%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 58.2%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.21%), family households with children (29.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 7.9%), and average family size (3.28 compared to 3.65, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 17.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 7.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.34%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 95.6%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 91.7%), and bachelor's degree (44.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 88.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.2% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.090%), 6th grade (96.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and 5th grade (96.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 69.2%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 65.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 65.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 12.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 23.1%).