Asian vs Samoan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,899,924 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to an increase of 5.9 Samoans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,057 compared to $39,826, a difference of 25.7%), median male earnings ($63,827 compared to $51,389, a difference of 24.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $92,385, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.7%), householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $54,610, a difference of 4.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,822 compared to $65,427, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 24.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 18.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.19%), single male poverty (11.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 24.9%), births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 21.8%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.1% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 1.5%), married-couple households (49.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (66.5% compared to 67.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 31.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 20.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 7.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 70.9%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 65.6%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.050%), 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 28.7%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 21.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 5.5%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.8%).