Asian vs Welsh Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 510,068,195 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Welsh within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.850. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Welsh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 7.2 Welsh.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($101,681 compared to $83,628, a difference of 21.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $93,039, a difference of 21.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $100,322, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 7.4%), householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $50,597, a difference of 12.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,822 compared to $60,666, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 25.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 22.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 4.6%), male poverty (10.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and poverty (11.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 20.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.85%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 24.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 19.6%), divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 18.2%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.1%), married-couple households (49.5% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (66.5% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 25.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 8.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 6.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 63.5%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.2%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.7% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 0.82%), 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 50.2%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 35.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.010%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.0%).