Asian vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,047,622 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.086. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 0.1 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($101,681 compared to $85,797, a difference of 18.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $95,560, a difference of 17.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $102,261, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.0%), householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $51,247, a difference of 11.2%), and per capita income ($50,057 compared to $44,987, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 18.3%), single female poverty (18.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 18.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.15%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.3%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 19.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.87%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 13.2%), divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 12.7%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.4%), average family size (3.28 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (66.5% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 7.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.60%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 37.5%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 19.1%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.7% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 0.45%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.71%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 22.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 21.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.46%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.1%).