Asian vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,765,791 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.535. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to an increase of 14.9 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $79,956, a difference of 40.9%), median male earnings ($63,827 compared to $45,607, a difference of 40.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $85,187, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $50,132, a difference of 13.7%), wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 17.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,822 compared to $56,768, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 42.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 39.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and single father poverty (14.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 38.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 25.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.70%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.91%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 18.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 43.0%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 28.7%), and births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 0.10%), family households (66.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.92%), and average family size (3.28 compared to 3.36, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.61%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 115.3%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 88.3%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 79.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 40.9%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 28.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 4.5%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.9%).