Luxembourger vs Immigrants Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Immigrants

Excellent
Fair
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,042
SOCIAL INDEX
28.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
235th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,581,182 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.316. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.245% in Immigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to a decrease of 245.0 Immigrants.
Luxembourger Integration in Immigrants Communities

Luxembourger vs Immigrants Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 9.2%), per capita income ($45,663 compared to $43,010, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $53,201, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($86,418 compared to $85,818, a difference of 0.70%), median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $39,328, a difference of 1.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $59,656, a difference of 2.2%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Fair
$43,010
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Fair
$100,962
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Good
$85,818
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Average
$46,478
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Average
$54,168
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Fair
$39,328
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Exceptional
$53,201
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Average
$94,423
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Average
$99,943
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Fair
$59,656
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Excellent
25.1%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 55.5%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 42.3%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 4.2%), single female poverty (20.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 5.5%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.2%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
10.0%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
19.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Poor
14.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
18.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
17.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Fair
21.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
12.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
13.0%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 29.0%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 27.9%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.4%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
18.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 31.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 3.2%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Tragic
79.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Tragic
34.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
82.1%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 23.2%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 11.1%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.8%), family households (63.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.6%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
66.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
28.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.33
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Poor
45.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Fair
32.7%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 117.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 5.3%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
11.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Excellent
20.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
6.8%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 75.6%), associate's degree (48.9% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and college, under 1 year (68.2% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
92.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
91.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
89.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
88.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
85.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
82.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
62.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
57.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Poor
44.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Fair
36.7%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Average
1.8%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.5%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.65%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and female disability (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.6%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Good
11.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Fair
23.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Poor
2.5%