Luxembourger vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,320,393 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.012. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to a decrease of 2.5 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $39,109, a difference of 2.0%), median family income ($106,183 compared to $104,282, a difference of 1.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,237 compared to $95,560, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.11%), householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $61,270, a difference of 0.50%), and median household income ($86,418 compared to $85,797, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 17.6%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 16.7%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.0%), single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and single female poverty (20.4% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 13.0%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.7%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and currently married (49.3% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.040%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 79.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 1.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 9.8%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (62.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.020%), college, under 1 year (68.2% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.6%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 1.3%), male disability (11.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.8%).