Luxembourger vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ghanaian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Ghanaians

Excellent
Fair
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,403
SOCIAL INDEX
21.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
261st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ghanaian Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,114,609 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.557. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.209% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 209.2 Ghanaians.
Luxembourger Integration in Ghanaian Communities

Luxembourger vs Ghanaian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 22.8%), per capita income ($45,663 compared to $42,164, a difference of 8.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,237 compared to $90,137, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $40,429, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $60,043, a difference of 1.5%), and median earnings ($47,640 compared to $46,440, a difference of 2.6%).
Luxembourger vs Ghanaian Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerGhanaian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Poor
$42,164
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Poor
$98,877
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Fair
$83,582
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Average
$46,440
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Poor
$52,810
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Excellent
$40,429
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Good
$52,594
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Tragic
$90,137
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Poor
$97,277
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Fair
$60,043
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
22.3%

Luxembourger vs Ghanaian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 52.7%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 47.8%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.53%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.71%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.6%).
Luxembourger vs Ghanaian Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerGhanaian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.9%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
10.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
14.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
18.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
18.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Poor
16.7%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Fair
29.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
12.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
14.0%

Luxembourger vs Ghanaian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 38.2%), female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 35.5%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.5%).
Luxembourger vs Ghanaian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerGhanaian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.2%

Luxembourger vs Ghanaian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 28.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
Luxembourger vs Ghanaian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerGhanaian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Tragic
35.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Good
83.0%

Luxembourger vs Ghanaian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 41.1%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 16.4%), and currently married (49.3% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.29%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.29, a difference of 5.9%).
Luxembourger vs Ghanaian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerGhanaian
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
42.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
42.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
34.3%

Luxembourger vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 207.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 27.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 13.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 23.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.2%).
Luxembourger vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerGhanaian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
16.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
83.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Tragic
48.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Tragic
16.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
5.2%

Luxembourger vs Ghanaian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 61.1%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and college, under 1 year (68.2% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Luxembourger vs Ghanaian Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerGhanaian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
92.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
91.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
87.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
84.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Poor
63.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Fair
58.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Fair
4.3%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Average
1.8%

Luxembourger vs Ghanaian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 27.1%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.0%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.94%), male disability (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.3%).
Luxembourger vs Ghanaian Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerGhanaian
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Good
11.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Poor
24.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Fair
47.5%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Average
2.5%