Luxembourger vs Malaysian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Malaysian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Malaysians

Excellent
Fair
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Malaysian Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,128,854 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.250. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.178% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 178.0 Malaysians.
Luxembourger Integration in Malaysian Communities

Luxembourger vs Malaysian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,663 compared to $39,194, a difference of 16.5%), median family income ($106,183 compared to $95,230, a difference of 11.5%), and median male earnings ($56,300 compared to $50,772, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $51,615, a difference of 2.5%), householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $58,244, a difference of 4.7%), and median household income ($86,418 compared to $81,064, a difference of 6.6%).
Luxembourger vs Malaysian Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerMalaysian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Tragic
$39,194
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Tragic
$95,230
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Tragic
$81,064
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Tragic
$43,844
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Tragic
$50,772
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Tragic
$37,298
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Poor
$51,615
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Tragic
$88,291
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Tragic
$94,517
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Tragic
$58,244
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Excellent
25.0%

Luxembourger vs Malaysian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 39.2%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 38.0%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 4.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 5.9%).
Luxembourger vs Malaysian Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerMalaysian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Poor
9.6%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Good
19.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
14.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
18.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
17.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
17.8%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
12.7%

Luxembourger vs Malaysian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.4%), female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.5%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.64%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.2%).
Luxembourger vs Malaysian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerMalaysian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Average
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Poor
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.5%

Luxembourger vs Malaysian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.94%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.7%).
Luxembourger vs Malaysian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerMalaysian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Fair
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Exceptional
39.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Exceptional
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
82.0%

Luxembourger vs Malaysian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 31.5%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 22.4%), and births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.1%), married-couple households (48.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.31, a difference of 6.6%).
Luxembourger vs Malaysian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerMalaysian
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
29.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.31
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Poor
45.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
33.9%

Luxembourger vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 43.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 8.4%).
Luxembourger vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerMalaysian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.7%

Luxembourger vs Malaysian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 74.2%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 36.0%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Luxembourger vs Malaysian Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerMalaysian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
94.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
93.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
92.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
90.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
89.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
87.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
83.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
62.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
55.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
41.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
32.9%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Tragic
12.0%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%

Luxembourger vs Malaysian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 18.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.9%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 4.5%).
Luxembourger vs Malaysian Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerMalaysian
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.5%