Luxembourger vs Hopi Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hopi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Hopi

Excellent
Poor
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,478
SOCIAL INDEX
12.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
306th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hopi Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,862,256 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Hopi within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.215. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Hopi. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 28.9 Hopi.
Luxembourger Integration in Hopi Communities

Luxembourger vs Hopi Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,663 compared to $31,177, a difference of 46.5%), median family income ($106,183 compared to $77,188, a difference of 37.6%), and wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $46,978, a difference of 7.2%), median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $33,932, a difference of 17.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $50,925, a difference of 19.7%).
Luxembourger vs Hopi Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerHopi
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Tragic
$31,177
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Tragic
$77,188
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Tragic
$65,043
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Tragic
$36,871
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Tragic
$42,060
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Tragic
$33,932
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Tragic
$46,978
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Tragic
$75,002
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Tragic
$75,562
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Tragic
$50,925
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
20.0%

Luxembourger vs Hopi Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 136.0%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 120.6%), and male poverty (9.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 118.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 20.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 35.2%), and single female poverty (20.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 37.1%).
Luxembourger vs Hopi Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerHopi
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
20.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
15.9%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
20.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
21.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
28.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
23.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
27.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
27.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
25.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
27.9%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
27.5%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Tragic
28.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
27.2%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
7.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
17.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
18.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
21.6%

Luxembourger vs Hopi Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 152.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 148.2%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 137.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.9%).
Luxembourger vs Hopi Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerHopi
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
8.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
21.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
30.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
19.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
8.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
6.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
16.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.4%

Luxembourger vs Hopi Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 42.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 19.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 12.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 13.3%).
Luxembourger vs Hopi Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerHopi
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
58.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Tragic
71.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Tragic
31.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Tragic
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
76.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
75.0%

Luxembourger vs Hopi Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 50.8%, a difference of 72.7%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 52.5%), and currently married (49.3% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.1%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.60, a difference of 15.9%).
Luxembourger vs Hopi Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerHopi
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
65.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
25.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
36.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.60
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
36.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
50.8%

Luxembourger vs Hopi Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 156.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 20.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 3.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 15.0%).
Luxembourger vs Hopi Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerHopi
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
13.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
86.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Tragic
49.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
6.9%

Luxembourger vs Hopi Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (39.8% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 57.1%), associate's degree (48.9% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 41.6%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.20%).
Luxembourger vs Hopi Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerHopi
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Good
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Good
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Good
95.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Fair
94.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
91.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
88.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
86.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
83.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
57.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
50.9%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
34.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
25.3%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Tragic
10.9%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
1.6%

Luxembourger vs Hopi Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 251.5%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 50.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 9.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 9.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.3%).
Luxembourger vs Hopi Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerHopi
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.2%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
12.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
4.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
30.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
52.9%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.9%