Luxembourger vs Welsh Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Welsh
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Welsh

Excellent
Good
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,335
SOCIAL INDEX
60.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
156th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Welsh Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,018,955 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Welsh within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Welsh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to a decrease of 3.1 Welsh.
Luxembourger Integration in Welsh Communities

Luxembourger vs Welsh Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,663 compared to $43,233, a difference of 5.6%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $37,856, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $50,597, a difference of 0.43%), householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $60,666, a difference of 0.50%), and median male earnings ($56,300 compared to $54,647, a difference of 3.0%).
Luxembourger vs Welsh Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerWelsh
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Fair
$43,233
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Average
$102,151
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Fair
$83,628
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Fair
$45,710
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Average
$54,647
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Tragic
$37,856
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Tragic
$50,597
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Fair
$93,039
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Average
$100,322
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Average
$60,666
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
28.9%

Luxembourger vs Welsh Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 15.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 15.1%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.080%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.4%).
Luxembourger vs Welsh Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerWelsh
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Poor
14.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Average
17.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Excellent
15.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Excellent
15.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Excellent
15.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
14.0%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
17.8%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
30.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
10.3%

Luxembourger vs Welsh Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 29.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.75%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 2.0%).
Luxembourger vs Welsh Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerWelsh
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
16.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Average
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
8.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%

Luxembourger vs Welsh Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.9%).
Luxembourger vs Welsh Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerWelsh
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
64.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Exceptional
42.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Exceptional
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
82.3%

Luxembourger vs Welsh Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.8%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.10 compared to 3.12, a difference of 0.52%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.58%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 0.62%).
Luxembourger vs Welsh Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerWelsh
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Excellent
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Poor
27.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
48.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Tragic
3.12
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Fair
32.0%

Luxembourger vs Welsh Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 33.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 13.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 8.1%).
Luxembourger vs Welsh Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerWelsh
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
7.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
93.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Exceptional
60.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.5%

Luxembourger vs Welsh Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 8.2%), bachelor's degree (39.8% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.4% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.020%), 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and 8th grade (97.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.16%).
Luxembourger vs Welsh Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerWelsh
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
97.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
94.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Exceptional
91.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Good
66.0%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Average
59.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Fair
45.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Fair
4.3%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Good
1.9%

Luxembourger vs Welsh Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 23.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.8%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.8%), disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 10.9%).
Luxembourger vs Welsh Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerWelsh
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Fair
23.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Excellent
47.0%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Average
2.5%