Luxembourger vs Cree Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cree
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Cree

Excellent
Poor
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,227
SOCIAL INDEX
19.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
266th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cree Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,977,145 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Cree within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.983. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.878% in Cree. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 878.2 Cree.
Luxembourger Integration in Cree Communities

Luxembourger vs Cree Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cree communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $87,185, a difference of 18.8%), median family income ($106,183 compared to $90,882, a difference of 16.8%), and median household income ($86,418 compared to $74,685, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $48,514, a difference of 3.8%), median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $37,018, a difference of 7.8%), and median earnings ($47,640 compared to $42,777, a difference of 11.4%).
Luxembourger vs Cree Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerCree
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Tragic
$40,056
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Tragic
$90,882
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Tragic
$74,685
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Tragic
$42,777
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Tragic
$49,497
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Tragic
$37,018
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Tragic
$48,514
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Tragic
$84,574
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Tragic
$87,185
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Tragic
$54,129
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
24.5%

Luxembourger vs Cree Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cree communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 51.8%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 50.2%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.11%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 12.8%).
Luxembourger vs Cree Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerCree
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
10.5%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
23.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
15.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
19.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
18.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
19.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
15.1%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Tragic
24.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
32.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
13.7%

Luxembourger vs Cree Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cree communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 32.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 30.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.7%).
Luxembourger vs Cree Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerCree
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
19.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
10.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.3%

Luxembourger vs Cree Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cree communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 4.2%).
Luxembourger vs Cree Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerCree
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
63.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Exceptional
40.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Exceptional
76.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
83.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
82.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
80.8%

Luxembourger vs Cree Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cree communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 25.6%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.1%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 3.3%).
Luxembourger vs Cree Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerCree
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
62.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
26.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
43.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Poor
6.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
44.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
37.0%

Luxembourger vs Cree Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cree communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 116.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.67%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 7.2%).
Luxembourger vs Cree Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerCree
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
11.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Fair
55.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
21.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.2%

Luxembourger vs Cree Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cree communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 20.7%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 19.5%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%).
Luxembourger vs Cree Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerCree
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Average
91.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Poor
85.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
63.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
56.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
42.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
33.6%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Tragic
12.8%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
1.6%

Luxembourger vs Cree Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cree communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 33.0%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 30.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 7.4%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 9.3%).
Luxembourger vs Cree Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerCree
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
13.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
25.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.8%