Luxembourger vs Ugandan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ugandan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Ugandans

Excellent
Average
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,220
SOCIAL INDEX
59.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
159th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ugandan Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,946,036 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.630. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.126% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 126.0 Ugandans.
Luxembourger Integration in Ugandan Communities

Luxembourger vs Ugandan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 14.0%), median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $40,889, a difference of 2.5%), and median male earnings ($56,300 compared to $55,290, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $103,472, a difference of 0.060%), median family income ($106,183 compared to $106,541, a difference of 0.34%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $61,177, a difference of 0.34%).
Luxembourger vs Ugandan Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerUgandan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Excellent
$45,047
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Excellent
$106,541
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Excellent
$87,557
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Excellent
$47,854
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Good
$55,290
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Exceptional
$40,889
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Tragic
$50,923
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Good
$96,667
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Excellent
$103,472
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Average
$61,177
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
24.1%

Luxembourger vs Ugandan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 37.6%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 34.1%), and male poverty (9.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 1.1%), single female poverty (20.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 5.2%).
Luxembourger vs Ugandan Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerUgandan
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Fair
9.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Poor
14.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
22.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Good
13.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Poor
18.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Poor
17.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Poor
17.2%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Good
28.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Poor
11.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Good
11.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Fair
12.2%

Luxembourger vs Ugandan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 45.0%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.0%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.8%).
Luxembourger vs Ugandan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerUgandan
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Good
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
12.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.9%

Luxembourger vs Ugandan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 16.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 0.98%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
Luxembourger vs Ugandan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerUgandan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
67.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Exceptional
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Good
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
83.7%

Luxembourger vs Ugandan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.9%), currently married (49.3% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.6%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (63.3% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 2.6%).
Luxembourger vs Ugandan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerUgandan
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
61.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
43.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Fair
6.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
44.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Excellent
30.1%

Luxembourger vs Ugandan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 113.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 17.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 6.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 10.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.7%).
Luxembourger vs Ugandan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerUgandan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
11.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
88.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Tragic
53.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Tragic
17.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
5.7%

Luxembourger vs Ugandan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.0%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.9%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (48.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.43%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.52%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.53%).
Luxembourger vs Ugandan Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerUgandan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Good
96.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Good
95.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Good
95.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Excellent
94.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Good
86.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Exceptional
61.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
48.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Exceptional
17.1%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
2.2%

Luxembourger vs Ugandan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.9%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 15.8%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.85%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.7%).
Luxembourger vs Ugandan Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerUgandan
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Good
11.1%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Excellent
22.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.3%