Luxembourger vs European Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
European
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Europeans

Excellent
Good
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,117
SOCIAL INDEX
78.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
87th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

European Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,438,023 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Europeans within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.461. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.244% in Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 244.5 Europeans.
Luxembourger Integration in European Communities

Luxembourger vs European Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and European communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 7.1%), householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $63,779, a difference of 4.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $51,796, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,663 compared to $45,836, a difference of 0.38%), median earnings ($47,640 compared to $47,915, a difference of 0.58%), and median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $39,457, a difference of 1.1%).
Luxembourger vs European Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerEuropean
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Exceptional
$45,836
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Exceptional
$108,099
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Exceptional
$88,751
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Excellent
$47,915
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Exceptional
$57,637
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Fair
$39,457
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Fair
$51,796
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Excellent
$98,310
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Exceptional
$106,367
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Exceptional
$63,779
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
29.4%

Luxembourger vs European Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and European communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 9.3%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and male poverty (9.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.74%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.86%), and single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 1.9%).
Luxembourger vs European Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerEuropean
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Poor
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Good
13.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
15.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Exceptional
14.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Average
29.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.5%

Luxembourger vs European Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 25.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.49%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.76%).
Luxembourger vs European Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerEuropean
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
16.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%

Luxembourger vs European Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.7%).
Luxembourger vs European Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerEuropean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Exceptional
41.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Fair
82.6%

Luxembourger vs European Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and European communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.8%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.3% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 0.14%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.2%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.0%).
Luxembourger vs European Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerEuropean
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
49.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Excellent
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Poor
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Excellent
30.2%

Luxembourger vs European Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 32.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 9.5%).
Luxembourger vs European Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerEuropean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
7.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
93.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Exceptional
61.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
22.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.6%

Luxembourger vs European Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and European communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.6%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.2% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 0.010%), 10th grade (95.4% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.080%).
Luxembourger vs European Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerEuropean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
97.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Exceptional
93.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Exceptional
91.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Exceptional
61.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Excellent
48.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Excellent
39.5%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Excellent
15.8%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
2.1%

Luxembourger vs European Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and European communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 15.5%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.5%), disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and female disability (11.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 7.4%).
Luxembourger vs European Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerEuropean
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.3%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Good
23.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Exceptional
46.7%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.4%