Luxembourger vs Filipino Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Filipino
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Filipinos

Excellent
Exceptional
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,951
SOCIAL INDEX
97.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
5th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Filipino Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,894,726 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.969. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.330% in Filipinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 330.4 Filipinos.
Luxembourger Integration in Filipino Communities

Luxembourger vs Filipino Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($86,418 compared to $115,509, a difference of 33.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,237 compared to $128,723, a difference of 32.4%), and median male earnings ($56,300 compared to $74,224, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 8.3%), householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $57,740, a difference of 14.6%), and median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $49,508, a difference of 24.1%).
Luxembourger vs Filipino Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerFilipino
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Exceptional
$59,066
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Exceptional
$138,397
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Exceptional
$115,509
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Exceptional
$61,197
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Exceptional
$74,224
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Exceptional
$49,508
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Exceptional
$57,740
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Exceptional
$128,723
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Exceptional
$134,910
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Exceptional
$76,686
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
29.7%

Luxembourger vs Filipino Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 28.5%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 25.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (9.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 3.4%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and poverty (10.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.6%).
Luxembourger vs Filipino Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerFilipino
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
6.6%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
10.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Exceptional
11.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Exceptional
11.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Exceptional
17.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
14.0%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Exceptional
24.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
7.4%

Luxembourger vs Filipino Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.5%), and unemployment (4.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.010%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.73%).
Luxembourger vs Filipino Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerFilipino
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
15.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
6.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
7.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%

Luxembourger vs Filipino Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 42.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 71.4%, a difference of 10.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.8%).
Luxembourger vs Filipino Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerFilipino
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Tragic
31.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Tragic
71.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
83.5%

Luxembourger vs Filipino Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 28.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.7%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.3% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 0.93%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (63.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.2%).
Luxembourger vs Filipino Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerFilipino
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
51.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Exceptional
49.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
9.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Exceptional
23.0%

Luxembourger vs Filipino Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 94.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.45%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 4.4%).
Luxembourger vs Filipino Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerFilipino
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Average
89.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
20.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
6.9%

Luxembourger vs Filipino Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 77.3%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 63.8%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.3% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.080%), high school diploma (91.7% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.44%).
Luxembourger vs Filipino Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerFilipino
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Excellent
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Exceptional
91.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Exceptional
89.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Exceptional
75.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Exceptional
71.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
59.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Exceptional
52.7%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Exceptional
23.4%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
7.6%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
3.4%

Luxembourger vs Filipino Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 31.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.0%).
Luxembourger vs Filipino Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerFilipino
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
9.6%
Males
Good
11.1%
Exceptional
9.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
8.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Exceptional
19.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Exceptional
45.4%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.7%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%