Luxembourger vs Crow Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Crow
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Crow

Excellent
Fair
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,555
SOCIAL INDEX
23.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
251st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Crow Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,452,491 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Crow within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.003. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Crow.
Luxembourger Integration in Crow Communities

Luxembourger vs Crow Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Crow communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,663 compared to $31,729, a difference of 43.9%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 43.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $74,257, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $47,012, a difference of 7.2%), median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $35,266, a difference of 13.1%), and median earnings ($47,640 compared to $38,707, a difference of 23.1%).
Luxembourger vs Crow Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerCrow
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Tragic
$31,729
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Tragic
$76,605
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Tragic
$63,681
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Tragic
$38,707
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Tragic
$42,434
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Tragic
$35,266
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Tragic
$47,012
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Tragic
$71,337
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Tragic
$74,257
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Tragic
$49,234
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
19.1%

Luxembourger vs Crow Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Crow communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 146.5%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 123.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 107.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 35.4%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 46.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 47.6%).
Luxembourger vs Crow Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerCrow
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
20.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
16.1%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
19.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
22.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
33.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
31.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
26.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
26.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
26.4%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
23.3%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Tragic
32.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
9.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
15.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
15.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
13.4%

Luxembourger vs Crow Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 264.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 247.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 234.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 11.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 30.1%).
Luxembourger vs Crow Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerCrow
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
11.1%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
20.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
26.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
15.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
10.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
13.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
17.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
16.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
14.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.2%

Luxembourger vs Crow Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 17.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 14.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 9.8%).
Luxembourger vs Crow Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerCrow
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
60.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Exceptional
38.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Exceptional
76.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
78.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
76.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
78.3%

Luxembourger vs Crow Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 57.5%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 37.1%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (63.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 17.2%).
Luxembourger vs Crow Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerCrow
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
65.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
41.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.82
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
40.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
14.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
40.4%

Luxembourger vs Crow Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 106.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 6.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 7.6%).
Luxembourger vs Crow Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerCrow
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Fair
89.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Good
55.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
22.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.8%

Luxembourger vs Crow Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Crow communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 46.2%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 44.4%), and bachelor's degree (39.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.3% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.20%), 10th grade (95.4% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.77%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 99.7%, a difference of 1.2%).
Luxembourger vs Crow Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerCrow
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
99.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
99.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
99.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
99.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
99.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
99.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
99.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
99.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
99.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
99.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
60.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
54.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
37.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
27.7%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Tragic
10.6%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%

Luxembourger vs Crow Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Crow communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 38.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 30.6%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 6.3%).
Luxembourger vs Crow Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerCrow
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
8.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
27.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
49.6%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Fair
17.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
6.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Poor
2.5%