Luxembourger vs Nonimmigrants Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
ImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Nonimmigrants
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Nonimmigrants

Excellent
Fair
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,083
SOCIAL INDEX
28.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
234th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Nonimmigrants Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,682,920 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.413. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.233% in Nonimmigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 233.1 Nonimmigrants.
Luxembourger Integration in Nonimmigrants Communities

Luxembourger vs Nonimmigrants Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,663 compared to $40,669, a difference of 12.3%), median family income ($106,183 compared to $96,231, a difference of 10.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,237 compared to $88,301, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.88%), householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $49,348, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $57,426, a difference of 6.2%).
Luxembourger vs Nonimmigrants Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerNonimmigrants
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Tragic
$40,669
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Tragic
$96,231
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Tragic
$79,429
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Tragic
$44,117
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Tragic
$52,170
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Tragic
$37,024
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Tragic
$49,348
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Tragic
$88,301
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Tragic
$94,448
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Tragic
$57,426
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
27.2%

Luxembourger vs Nonimmigrants Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 36.8%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 35.5%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.1%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.2%).
Luxembourger vs Nonimmigrants Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerNonimmigrants
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
9.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
21.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
15.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
19.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
17.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
18.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
18.3%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
14.6%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Tragic
23.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
32.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Average
12.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Poor
12.4%

Luxembourger vs Nonimmigrants Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 33.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 27.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 6.4%).
Luxembourger vs Nonimmigrants Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerNonimmigrants
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Average
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Poor
5.4%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Fair
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Average
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
8.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.7%

Luxembourger vs Nonimmigrants Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 13.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 3.8%).
Luxembourger vs Nonimmigrants Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerNonimmigrants
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
63.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Tragic
78.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Exceptional
40.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Exceptional
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
83.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
81.2%

Luxembourger vs Nonimmigrants Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 20.7%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 20.2%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.8%), family households (63.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.7%).
Luxembourger vs Nonimmigrants Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerNonimmigrants
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
64.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Good
46.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Poor
6.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
35.5%

Luxembourger vs Nonimmigrants Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 47.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 0.51%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 4.3%).
Luxembourger vs Nonimmigrants Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerNonimmigrants
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
92.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Exceptional
58.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
21.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.2%

Luxembourger vs Nonimmigrants Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 18.4%), bachelor's degree (39.8% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 16.4%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
Luxembourger vs Nonimmigrants Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerNonimmigrants
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
95.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Good
92.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Fair
91.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
62.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
56.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
42.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
34.2%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Tragic
13.3%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
1.7%

Luxembourger vs Nonimmigrants Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 27.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 23.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 6.2%), disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 10.5%).
Luxembourger vs Nonimmigrants Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerNonimmigrants
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.2%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
25.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Fair
17.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
6.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%