Hawaiian vs Asian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 324,921,800 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.501. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.393% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 393.5 Asians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,403 compared to $50,057, a difference of 27.0%), median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $63,827, a difference of 26.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,722 compared to $112,666, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $68,822, a difference of 6.0%), householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $57,003, a difference of 7.4%), and wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 33.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 24.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 22.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.7%), births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 24.0%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.7% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (67.4% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 27.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 16.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 66.1%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 60.0%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 59.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.020%), 9th grade (94.7% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 31.4%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 26.4%), and male disability (12.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 4.8%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.1%).