Hawaiian vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 312,821,123 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.106% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 106.4 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,403 compared to $53,874, a difference of 36.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,722 compared to $119,496, a difference of 31.7%), and median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $66,078, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.3%), householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $70,238, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $58,239, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 34.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 29.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 1.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 29.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 20.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 39.5%), births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 31.5%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.8% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.8%), currently married (46.6% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (67.4% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 74.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 38.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 7.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 13.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 26.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 99.0%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 89.4%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 76.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.060%), 9th grade (94.7% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and 4th grade (97.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 39.3%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 27.9%), and male disability (12.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.4%), disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.5%).