Hawaiian vs Apache Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 189,760,879 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Apache within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.253. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Apache. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 11.6 Apache.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,778 compared to $82,184, a difference of 20.2%), median household income ($84,729 compared to $70,927, a difference of 19.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $54,668, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 1.3%), median female earnings ($37,497 compared to $34,895, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $49,395, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 74.1%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 71.1%), and family poverty (9.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 63.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 25.3%), single female poverty (21.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 30.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 35.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 57.7%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 54.6%), and male unemployment (5.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 20.0%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.5%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 0.98%), family households (67.4% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.46, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 37.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (40.9% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 12.9%), bachelor's degree (31.6% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 11.8%), and college, 1 year or more (55.6% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.030%), 7th grade (95.8% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and 6th grade (96.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 66.8%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 30.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.3%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 8.0%).