Argentinean vs Apache Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 161,234,923 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Apache within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Apache. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 8.2 Apache.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Apache communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,862 compared to $34,886, a difference of 42.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,103 compared to $82,184, a difference of 34.0%), and median family income ($112,665 compared to $84,451, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $49,395, a difference of 9.6%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 9.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,246 compared to $54,668, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Apache communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 81.1%), family poverty (8.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 76.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 76.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 13.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 18.8%), and single mother poverty (27.2% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 34.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Apache communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 90.8%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 70.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 70.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Apache communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 60.7%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Apache communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 34.8%), births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 33.0%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.4%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.46, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Apache communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 11.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.27%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Apache communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 67.2%), master's degree (18.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 65.8%), and bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.030%), 7th grade (95.9% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and 5th grade (97.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Apache communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 70.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 59.2%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 12.2%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 16.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.0%).