Argentinean vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,702,785 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.150. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 14.6 Immigrants from Northern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,862 compared to $46,531, a difference of 7.2%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,103 compared to $105,430, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,952 compared to $42,084, a difference of 0.31%), median earnings ($50,399 compared to $49,648, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $53,185, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 9.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.27%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.76%), and receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 7.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.33%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.7%), married-couple households (47.5% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.10%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.1%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and master's degree (18.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.0%), 7th grade (95.9% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and 9th grade (94.8% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 9.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.54%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.63%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.2%).