Argentinean vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,487,170 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.271. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 43.6 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,862 compared to $36,690, a difference of 35.9%), median male earnings ($60,117 compared to $45,607, a difference of 31.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,103 compared to $85,187, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $50,132, a difference of 8.0%), householder income over 65 years ($65,246 compared to $56,768, a difference of 14.9%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 17.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 29.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 27.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.68%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 30.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 29.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 21.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 40.0%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 23.1%), and births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.4%), currently married (47.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.8%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 17.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 102.5%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 102.2%), and master's degree (18.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 76.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.40%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.41%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 40.9%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 29.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.20%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.6%).