Argentinean vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,603,677 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.258. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.056% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 56.2 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,862 compared to $39,827, a difference of 25.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,103 compared to $91,385, a difference of 20.5%), and median male earnings ($60,117 compared to $50,298, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,952 compared to $38,028, a difference of 10.3%), householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $48,749, a difference of 11.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,246 compared to $57,114, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 34.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 32.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.0%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 15.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.49%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 17.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.6%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.0%), and births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.0%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 7.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.68%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.88%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 51.6%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 50.1%), and master's degree (18.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 30.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.6%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.0%).