Argentinean vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,208,895 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.097% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 97.5 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,862 compared to $44,987, a difference of 10.8%), median household income ($93,960 compared to $85,797, a difference of 9.5%), and median male earnings ($60,117 compared to $55,415, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $51,247, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,246 compared to $61,270, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 17.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.27%), female poverty (12.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and poverty (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 22.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.76%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.9%), family households (65.0% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.10%), currently married (47.1% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.8%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 16.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 23.8%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 18.9%), and master's degree (18.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.4% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.38%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 23.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 21.1%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.5%).