Argentinean vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,131,383 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.122. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 12.6 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $52,540, a difference of 3.1%), median family income ($112,665 compared to $114,553, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,111 compared to $104,578, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($93,960 compared to $93,971, a difference of 0.010%), householder income over 65 years ($65,246 compared to $65,326, a difference of 0.12%), and median male earnings ($60,117 compared to $60,350, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.4% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 17.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%), single mother poverty (27.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.45%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 7.4%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 7.3%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.23%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.89%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 17.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.9%), master's degree (18.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.0%), 4th grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and 3rd grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.080%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.34%).