Turkish vs Ugandan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,915,235 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.747. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.105% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 105.0 Ugandans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,391 compared to $45,047, a difference of 16.3%), median male earnings ($64,253 compared to $55,290, a difference of 16.2%), and wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $50,923, a difference of 6.6%), median female earnings ($44,695 compared to $40,889, a difference of 9.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,037 compared to $61,177, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 29.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 27.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father poverty (15.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 34.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 17.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.050%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (63.6% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.7%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.52%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.3%), doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.8%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 17.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.49%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.0%).