Turkish vs Crow Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,610,574 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Crow within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.534. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.147% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 147.2 Crow.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Crow communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,391 compared to $31,729, a difference of 65.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,814 compared to $74,257, a difference of 58.7%), and median family income ($121,202 compared to $76,605, a difference of 58.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $47,012, a difference of 15.4%), median female earnings ($44,695 compared to $35,266, a difference of 26.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,037 compared to $49,234, a difference of 38.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Crow communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 121.6%), family poverty (7.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 114.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 112.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 36.7%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 41.5%), and single mother poverty (26.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 46.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 267.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 232.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 227.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 11.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 77.8%), births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 47.0%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.26%), family households (63.6% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Crow communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 33.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 21.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Crow communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 96.5%), master's degree (19.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 87.1%), and doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 80.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.8% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.27%), 10th grade (95.0% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and 11th grade (94.0% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Crow communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 51.5%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 48.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 8.6%).