Turkish vs Marshallese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Turkish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Marshallese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Turks

Marshallese

Exceptional
Fair
9,373
SOCIAL INDEX
91.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
17th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,873
SOCIAL INDEX
26.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
240th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Marshallese Integration in Turkish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 11,183,762 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.962. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.489% in Marshallese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 488.9 Marshallese.
Turkish Integration in Marshallese Communities

Turkish vs Marshallese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,391 compared to $39,108, a difference of 34.0%), median male earnings ($64,253 compared to $48,137, a difference of 33.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,318 compared to $83,575, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($68,037 compared to $65,874, a difference of 3.3%), householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $50,627, a difference of 7.2%), and wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 18.2%).
Turkish vs Marshallese Income
Income MetricTurkishMarshallese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,391
Tragic
$39,108
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$121,202
Tragic
$95,293
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$99,389
Tragic
$78,930
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,919
Tragic
$41,969
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$64,253
Tragic
$48,137
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,695
Tragic
$36,459
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,266
Tragic
$50,627
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$110,318
Tragic
$83,575
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$117,814
Tragic
$90,455
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$68,037
Exceptional
$65,874
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
23.4%

Turkish vs Marshallese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 48.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 36.4%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.0%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 7.3%).
Turkish vs Marshallese Poverty
Poverty MetricTurkishMarshallese
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
13.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
9.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
14.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
15.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Tragic
19.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
18.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
18.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.7%
Tragic
18.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
16.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.7%
Tragic
23.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.8%
Tragic
16.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.4%
Tragic
32.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Average
5.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
14.1%

Turkish vs Marshallese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 42.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 38.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.6%).
Turkish vs Marshallese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTurkishMarshallese
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Poor
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Tragic
11.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
3.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
8.9%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.6%

Turkish vs Marshallese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.9%).
Turkish vs Marshallese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTurkishMarshallese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
64.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
78.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.4%
Exceptional
39.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.9%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
83.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.7%
Tragic
79.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.8%
Tragic
80.3%

Turkish vs Marshallese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 26.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.1%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.16%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and currently married (47.8% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 5.0%).
Turkish vs Marshallese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTurkishMarshallese
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Tragic
63.7%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Tragic
26.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Exceptional
3.38
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
45.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.4%
Tragic
34.8%

Turkish vs Marshallese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 39.9%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 18.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 54.9%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 15.4%).
Turkish vs Marshallese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTurkishMarshallese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.4%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.3%
Fair
54.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
21.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
8.1%

Turkish vs Marshallese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 82.7%), master's degree (19.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 72.0%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 65.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.15%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.16%).
Turkish vs Marshallese Education Level
Education Level MetricTurkishMarshallese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Excellent
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Fair
94.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Poor
90.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.2%
Poor
88.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.5%
Poor
84.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.7%
Tragic
61.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
65.5%
Tragic
55.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.9%
Tragic
41.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
31.7%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.9%
Tragic
11.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
1.5%

Turkish vs Marshallese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 35.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 29.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.7%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 9.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.0%).
Turkish vs Marshallese Disability
Disability MetricTurkishMarshallese
Disability
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
0.94%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Tragic
25.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Tragic
50.1%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
17.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
6.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%