Turkish vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,037,099 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.366. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.182% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 182.4 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,391 compared to $36,690, a difference of 42.8%), median male earnings ($64,253 compared to $45,607, a difference of 40.9%), and median family income ($121,202 compared to $87,387, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $50,132, a difference of 8.3%), householder income over 65 years ($68,037 compared to $56,768, a difference of 19.9%), and wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 39.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 37.4%), and receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.53%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 35.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 31.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.45%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 52.0%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 31.4%), and births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.3%), family households (63.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 34.3%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 22.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 136.3%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 112.1%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 93.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.69%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.69%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 37.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 28.4%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.5%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 7.4%).