Turkish vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,652,307 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.568. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.156% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 156.0 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,391 compared to $44,987, a difference of 16.5%), median family income ($121,202 compared to $104,282, a difference of 16.2%), and median male earnings ($64,253 compared to $55,415, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.86%), householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $51,247, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,037 compared to $61,270, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 17.2%), single female poverty (18.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 15.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.71%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.35%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.72%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.1%), births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 10.4%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.60%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.65%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 26.8%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 21.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 29.9%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 29.7%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.010%), 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.010%), and 4th grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 17.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 15.5%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 2.3%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.2%).