Turkish vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,684,589 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.485. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.275% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 275.2 Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,391 compared to $39,403, a difference of 33.0%), median male earnings ($64,253 compared to $50,488, a difference of 27.3%), and median earnings ($53,919 compared to $43,673, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $53,078, a difference of 2.2%), householder income over 65 years ($68,037 compared to $64,920, a difference of 4.8%), and wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 36.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 23.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 34.6%), births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 21.0%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.8% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.020%), currently married (47.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 53.5%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 45.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 11.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 31.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 82.3%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 80.2%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 71.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.34%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 27.8%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 23.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.9%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 7.7%).