Turkish vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,387,207 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.091. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to a decrease of 12.6 Immigrants from Northern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,391 compared to $46,531, a difference of 12.6%), median family income ($121,202 compared to $108,161, a difference of 12.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,814 compared to $105,430, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $53,185, a difference of 2.0%), median female earnings ($44,695 compared to $42,084, a difference of 6.2%), and median earnings ($53,919 compared to $49,648, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 18.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.0%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 0.73%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.9%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.19%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 7.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 1.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 25.9%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.6%), and no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 6.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.57%), male disability (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.1%).