Turkish vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,058,251 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.701. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.093% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 93.1 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,391 compared to $29,031, a difference of 80.5%), median family income ($121,202 compared to $70,989, a difference of 70.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,814 compared to $69,759, a difference of 68.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 23.9%), householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $42,380, a difference of 28.1%), and median female earnings ($44,695 compared to $33,046, a difference of 35.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 174.7%), family poverty (7.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 150.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 126.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.4% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 52.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 55.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 66.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 118.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 107.6%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 97.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 30.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 16.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 87.6%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 61.5%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 61.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.8%), family households (63.6% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 41.2%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 23.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 1.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 116.0%), master's degree (19.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 111.0%), and doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 97.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.26%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.26%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 65.0%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 64.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.7%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.8%), and female disability (11.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 27.6%).